Religion
|
Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:34 | Written by joni
SMH reports that Archbishop Peter Jensen has lobbied the NSW Premier because he fears that secular ethics clases could "jeopardise the future of religious education". NSW is launching a trial of ethics classes which will be trialed/reviewed by the St James Ethics Center. During the initial consultation process Dr Jensen refused to meet representatives from the St James Ethics Centre, which will conduct the trial, according to its executive director, Simon Longstaff. Why would Jensen refuse? What is wrong with non-religious teaching of ethics? The article goes on to say that the church thinks that enrolments in religious classes could fall. 'Be warned: if the government allows this course to continue after the trial, it will jeopardise religious education in public schools,' Dr Jensen wrote in the Anglican newspaper Southern Cross. 'Without such a religious component, public schools will cease to be inclusive of all children.' Why does the church think they have a monopoly on ethics? Why is it bad if parents decide that secular ethics classes are better for their children? |
||
|